Friday, January 14, 2011

Family Game

10 015
Gramma with Bee & Boo

Last night we had my m-i-l over for supper, and invited her to stay afterward for a game of Mexican Rummy. First hand: 2 sets; Bug(13) was out before I could even pick up my cards! Second hand: 1 set, 1 run. Continued...
3rd: 2 runs
4th: 3 sets
5th: 2 sets, 1 run -- Son(9) gloated that he was dealt a perfect hand and would be down so quick it would make our heads spin. Didn't quite happen. Couldn't get the "one card" he needed, so most were down before he went out.
6th: 2 runs, 1 set
7th: 3 runs, all different suits, must lay all cards down, no discard -- Gramma (m-i-l) won!!

Shocking thought -- do you realize how few American households were likely to be enjoying a multi-generational family game last night??  What a loss.  Such a simple joy!





Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Why Is the Age of the Earth an Important Issue? Why Make a Big Deal of It?


To answer this, I'm taking info directly from The New Answers Book 1 from Answers in Genesis, edited by Ken Ham, because it's so clearly presented there's no point in my re-doing it.  All quotation of the book will be italicized.  So, beginning on page 26...

...some of the reasons we think that Christians cannot accept millions of years without doing great damage to the church and her witness in the world.
1.  The Bible clearly teaches that God created in six literal, 24-hour days a few thousand years ago.  The Hebrew word for day in Genesis 1 is yom.  In the vast majority of its uses in the Old Testament it means a literal day; and where it doesn't, the context makes this clear. 
2.  The context of Genesis 1 clearly shows that the days of creation were literal days.  First, yom is defined the first time it is used in the Bible (Genesis 1:4-5) in its two literal senses: the light portion of the light/dark cycle and the whole light/dark cycle.  Second, yom is used with "evening" and "morning."  Everywhere these two words are used in the Old Testament, either together or separately and with or without yom in the context, they always mean a literal evening or morning of a literal day.  Third, yom is modified with a number: one day, second day, third day, etc., which everywhere else in the Old Testament indicates literal days.  Fourth, yom is defined literally in Genesis 1:14 in relation to heavenly bodies.
3.  The genealogies of Genesis 5 and 11 make it clear that the creation days happened only about 6,000 years ago.  It is transparent from the genealogies of Genesis 5 and 11 (which give very detailed chronological information, unlike the clearly abbreviated genealogy in Matthew 1) and other chronological information in the Bible that the Creation Week took place only about 6,000 years ago.
4.  Exodus 20:9-11 blocks all attempts to fit millions of years into Genesis 1.  "Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is a sabbath of the Lord your God; in it you shall not do any work, you or your son or your daughter, your male or your female servant or your cattle or your sojourner who stays with you.  For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea and all that is in them, and rested on the seventh day; therfore the Lord blessed the sabbath day and made it holy"  (Exodus 20:9-11) 
     This passage gives the reason for God's command to Israel to work six days and then take a sabbath rest.  Yom is used in both parts of the commandment.  If God meant that the Jews were to work six days because He created over six long periods of time, He could have said that using one of three indefinite Hebrew time words.  He chose the only word that means a literal day, and the Jews understood it literally (until the idea of millions of years developed in the early nineteenth century).  For this reason, the day-age view or framework hypothesis must be rejected.  The gap theory or any other attempt to put millions of years before the six days are also false because God says that in six days He made the heave and the earth and the sea and all that is in them.  So He made everything in those six literal days and nothing before the first day.
5.  Noah's Flood washes away millions of years.  The evidence in Genesis 6-9 for a global catastrophic flood is overwhelming.  For example, the Flood was intended to destroy not only all sinful people but also all land animals and birds and the surface of the earth, which only a global flood could accomplish. The Ark's purpose was to save two of every kind of land animal and bird (and seven of some) to repopulate the earth after the Flood.  The Ark was totally unnecessary if the Flood was only local.  People, animals, and birds could have migrated out of the flood zone before it occurred, or the zone could have been populated from creatures outside the area after the Flood.  The catastrophic nature of the Flood is seen in the nonstop rain for at least 40 days, which would have produced massive erosion, mud slides, hurricanes, etc.  The Hebrew words translated "the fountains of the great deep burst open" (Genesis 7:11) clearly point to tectonic rupturing of the earth's surface in many places for 150 days, resulting in volcanoes, earthquakes, and tsunamis.  Noah's Flood would produce exactly the kind of complex geological record we see worldwide today: thousands of feet of sediments clearly deposited by water and later hardened into rock and containing billions of fossils.  If the year-long Flood is responsible for most of the rock layers and fossils, then those rocks and fossils cannot represent the history of the earth over millions of years, as evolutionists claim.

"Okay, so you've addressed literal translation of Genesis, but you still haven't answered why this is sooooo important?"  Next week I'll complete posting the AiG answer to this question which addresses Jesus' position, the Bible's authority, and faulty science.  And if you want more information on this, read The New Answers Book 1.  They go in to much more detail in answering these questions and others than I have time for here.

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Gray Glory


The heavens proclaim the glory of God. 
The skies display his craftsmanship.  Psalm 19:1 NLT

Monday, January 10, 2011

Biblical Education

I'm 41 today.  I hope my 42nd year will be one of being "diligent to show myself approved to God as a workman who does not need to be ashamed, handling accurately the word of truth" (2Timothy 2:15).   I pray that I will (paraphrasing Colossians 1:28) proclaim Christ, admonishing and teaching my children with all wisdom, that I may present them complete in Christ, and that I will labor for this purpose, "striving according to His power which mightily works within me".  (Colossians. 1:29)
      And this is why we use the Weaver Curriculum.  We believe knowledge of God and His Word is the most important knowledge the kids can possess.  
     A while back in our "home education journey", having tried the classical approach, the Charlotte Mason method, and literature-based unit studies (among others), we began to question more deeply our real purpose and goals in educating our children.  
  • What does it matter if they "speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love" for God and others?  
  • What is truly the point of knowing "all mysteries and all knowledge" without loving and knowing God? (referencing 1 Corinthians 13:1-2)    
  • So what if they've read every great book in the Sonlight catalog or every "living book" on commendable book lists.  Can any of them (or even all of them taken together) claim to be "inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; that the man of God may be fully adequate, equipped for every good work" (2Timothy 3:16-17)?  
  •  And why, really, why in the world am I willing to teach an entire year on the Little House on the Prairie (or the Chronicles of Narnia or various topics such as sharks or castles), but doubt the validity of teaching based on God's Word?
     So here we are nearly a year into Weaver, enjoying it immensely, learning an incredible amount on a whole variety of topics.  Most significantly, tho, we are finding that indeed the Scriptures are more than sufficient for all we need to know.

Saturday, August 21, 2010

More fun fishing.  
picnikfile_KdVSu7
Husband & Son had a very successful fishing trip Thursday eve.  Son was so proud to have caught The Biggest.

Wednesday, August 11, 2010

Summer occupations:


the 6th (yes, 6th!) lug of peaches
In addition to fresh eating and the peach ice cream we'll make this evening, I've already canned 26 quarts of sliced peaches and 21 jars (of various sizes) of jam, but everyone decided that wasn't enough jam.  So back to the store this morning for another lug!


And fishing
















Husband and kids finally had a chance to go fishing -- the first this year.  They had a fun evening and we had a great supper the next day.







Wednesday, July 28, 2010

ERRRRRGH!!!  I took several beautiful pictures on our nature walk this morning, intending to post them today.  But when I attempted to download them, the camera seemed to jam up part way through and now isn't reading any picts.  Hopefully Husband can fix it later.  In the meantime, here are some spring picts of kids.

                                  My beautiful girls on Mother's Day.

                        Son & Littlest playing drums for worship time.

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Just returned from the dentist.  They deep-cleaned the lower left back teeth, deep enough to require anesthetic.  Then they pulled my upper left wisdom tooth.  Wasn't too bad --tho not very fun right now with one side of my face numb, and trying to bite firmly on the gauze with my lower gums complaining loudly.  M-I-L & Bug are determined that I will rest as much as I need so helping with kids and dinner.  How blessed I am!

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

I will return!  I must!  I simply must find time to keep in touch with my dear friends too far away to visit.  Somehow....